Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Affordable Edition of The Making of Stanley Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey'

The book The Making of Stanley Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey' is being reprinted at a fraction of its $1000 first edition price.

This behind-the-scenes documentation of 2001: A Space Odyssey sheds light on the lead actors, senior production designers, special-effects experts, and masters Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, who together revolutionized the art of cinema and science fiction respectively.

The book was previously available as part of the multi-volume sell-out Collector's Edition.  This release includes on and off set photographs, pre-production paintings, and conceptual designs from the Kubrick archives. With numerous fold-outs, these images offer insight both into Kubrick's meticulous directorial methods, and into the mysteries of a film ahead of its time.

The book was written and researched over several years by the outer space, special effects, and technology journalist Piers Bizony.

Anyone looking to see the detail that went into the film, the technology, or look to recreate the vision will delight in this book.

This edition will be available September 5th at booksellers.  You can pre-order at (link below) at a discount over the retail price of $75.00 / 59.99 euro.

Saturday, August 8, 2015

HP Envy 15 Battery Power Issue

I had an issue where rather quickly my HP Envy 15 3033CL laptop died with no ability to power up even with the AC power brick plugged in.  Just an orange LED on the WiFi button flashed.
Googling the issue was not much help.  Many people have had their laptops do similar things but no posted resolutions.

If there seems to be a power on issue, the power system is the best suspect.  There is no easy to spot & replace battery.  You can take the one cover on the rear off and there is a black space on the right that is the battery.  No way to see how it comes out.

You can follow the battery steps in this guide to remove the battery.  There are 3 hidden screws which keep the battery in place.  You'll need a #2 star bit to remove the screws once you take the black stickers off the 3 screw heads.  The iFixit 54 Bit Driver Kit has the bit you need.  
The battery is a model HP LR08XL.  It isn't common so it is a bit more expensive than some other batteries.  You can use your favorite online shop or search engine to find a replacement using the model number.  Amazon in the US has them.

Note: many manufacturers appear to be in your country but actually ship product from China.  Look to see where the company says it will ship from if you care about local stock vs., in-country vs. Chinese.  The further away, the longer it takes to arrive most often.

Install the battery and button the laptop back up.  Charge for several hours before first use.

I found that my laptop was not charging the battery properly while I was using it, only charging while off.  I suspect the power brick.
Fortunately I had another HP charger of the right amperage but only 18.5 volts vs. 19.5 volts.  Trying it, it is now charging the battery while using the laptop.

I do believe the battery was faulty, not sure about the power brick.

With the battery removed, you cannot use the laptop on AC power only.  Oh well, thanks HP.

Hopefully someone with this laptop or similar finds this helpful.


Sunday, July 12, 2015

In the Windows 10 Era: Microsoft Wins, Intel and AMD Vie for Scraps

For the last 25 years, there has been a dominance in the computer industry: WINTEL, a nickname for the Microsoft & Intel dominance.  It has varied over the years - AMD rose up to challenge Intel, Microsoft has had challenges including government charges and Apple.
How did they do it: Microsoft built Windows versions which used more system resources.  Intel would build processors (and chipsets, and other items) that would be more powerful to meet Windows' demands.  With special catering to business and enthusiasts, this teaming provided growth and revenue for both companies year after year.  Governments investigated various times when dominance was against consumer rights but generally the progress was steady.

The entire mountain is now in collapse.  Let's look at things:


After the failure that was Windows Vista, corporate clients have stuck with Windows XP basically until the bitter end.  This has reduced Microsoft's income from sales of operating systems.  Windows 7 has been adopted by many but corporations have trimmed IT budgets to the point where what IT staff have been left have not wanted to move their constituency off XP and Windows Server 2003.  This late switching costs Microsoft revenue.  

Microsoft has also attacked windmills left and right - Lotus, dBase, Wordperfect, Google, Apple, many more over the years - whenever they foresaw a threat, they would try to outdo the threat through skill or maneuvering, always using up valuable resources (usually to little end for the consumers).

Most shops shifting off Windows XP have chosen Windows 7, lowering revenue and compatibility of the current Windows 8 frontline system.


The confluence of several issues:
1) With the lag in software sales, the amount of new hardware being purchase has slowed, with chip sales in a huge slump.
2) The tablet market slowed sales of traditional desktop and laptops significantly.  Intel has been late to the low power mobile space with cool, efficient, powerful chips.

Intel has hoped to keep the high end computing market going, especially as new servers are required.  But Intel has had problems with their 14nm chip fabrication, needed to reduce chip power and size (size = more chips per wafer, making more money).  Intel's process tick-tock release schedule (improvements, then shrink in size, then more improvements, etc., is seriously stalled with newer chips not on a new process or with significant hardware improvements.  Some say the hardware improvements have actually been stagnant since 2011.  Intel's withheld 6 core and higher core chips from affordable consumers.

Hardware's Downfall: Windows 10

With Steve Ballmer gone, Microsoft's new CEO is trying to save the company in the face of the above scenario coupled with threats from Apple and cloud computing.  Windows 10 upgrades for many for free will be a huge boon to capturing customers.  And Windows 10 can run on some hardware that is 8 to 10 years old, breathing life into hardware already paid for.

Few people will now be buying many new Intel (or AMD) chips just to run Windows 10 like they might have for new versions of Windows in the past.  Why when it runs well on current and past hardware?    Intel and AMD stock has tanked and Intel has lost some key management.

The key is to watch what companies may do - stay on Windows 7 until end of life or adopt Windows 10.  Microsoft must include features in the OS worth upgrading to - both for home and office users.  Do not do it through past trickery, but do it through winning over customers with superior product & service.  Focus on your core and that's what they've done this month.

Hardware - a Possible Path

Intel must cut hardware costs.  They have a very high margin for current chips.  If new fabrication plants will be spun up slower, funnel the money into cheaper chips, fueling savings and making stock holders see Intel is not down & out.  Also allow for cheaper 6 core chips (about $350) and 8 core chips ($499).  They are in your servers, allow them on the desktop.

If Intel cannot move hardware down a bit, then perhaps AMD can move in in the budget space.  But they'd better look to advertise how well their chips run Windows 10.

Where do you see the market?

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Comparing Microcontroller + Wifi Breakout Boards

There was a large interest in last week's post on WiFi solutions for microcontrollers.  These days Makers are often looking to choose development boards that contain both a microcontroller and a WiFi transceiver. There are many benefits:

  • The solution is pre-made and debugged - ready for integrating into a project
  • Size is often smaller
  • FCC certification is most often done for the module
  • Often cost is lower than separate WiFi and microcontroller breakout boards
With that, here is the comparison:
For a larger view, click here
and here are the caveats:
  1. The data is gathered via the whole web and the web is often wrong, so don't take every value as fact, use it as a value which you can check if interested.
  2. Some of the prices have a "+" next to them - those boards require additional circuit boards with breakout capabilities, power, etc.
  3. Some boards are due out in the next 3 months, noted in "Availability"
  4. Some values are not clear from manufacturer data, so the values may be from components or left as unknown.
  5. Prices can vary, they are retail prices and probably have shipping, taxes, etc.  For the ESP-12, they are available from eBay to retailers, the amount of Flash memory may vary depending on how they were manufactured.  Also FCC markings may or may not be valid depending on manufacturing to the tested configuration.  Companies using ESP8266 modules generally buy FCC compliant subsystems.
  6. Wireless boards that do not have 802.11 b/g/... WiFi were not compared.  That would be for a separate comparison.
  7. All boards were TCP and UDP capable (as far as I saw) and can do Client and Server duties so I didn't compare those characteristics.
  8. The data may change over time (especially price), and additional boards will become popular.
I didn't add the ESP8266 ESP-01 module to this list although it qualifies.  See last week's post and use the ESP-12 values with only 2 GPIO, no analog pin and costing a bit less.

I didn't add every board on the market.  I am trying to keep the list to popular and commonly available boards.  You can use the table to compare features with other manufacturer's boards.


I am very happy that we are not stuck with the status quo of 3 years ago, where adding a WiFi capability to a microcontroller board costs over $75.  Manufacturers know that the Internet of Things really needs small, low cost, programmable WiFi communications and control devices.

Some of these solutions have very good cloud infrastructures provided by the manufacturers to program and communicate.  These may help overcome the learning curve for programming and/or it may provide easier methods for Internet communication.  The downside could be if the manufacturer decides to leave the product, the web service could close.  

As for Arduino IDE programmable capability, this is as of today and is for the versions of the software.  Many boards are billed as "Arduino compatible" but that may be electrically or programmable via a similar language.  Personally I like the ability to take code from existing projects and libraries and use them on a different board.  I recently ported NeoPixel and LED matrix code to the Adafruit Huzzah.


The choice of what product to use is up to you.  Everyone has their top requirements which could be compute power, connectivity. price, etc.  For a large segment of the market, price is a large factor.  Then again size for wearables may be a factor - all these modules are fairly small but may require larger batteries for long life.

If you like these comparisons, leave comments on what else would be good to compare.  And again, if there is an error, leave a comment and I'll look to change the inaccuracy.


Here are primary links to the boards.  Some of the information in the table is from other sources web-wide.

  1. Adafruit Huzzah ESP8266
  2. NodeMCU Version 2
  3. Generic ESP-12 (not E)
  4. Electric Imp imp001
  5. Intel Edison
  6. Particle Core
  7. Particle Photon
  8. WiPy WiPy
  9. Digistump Oak

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Comparing Modern Microcontroller WiFi Solutions

Comparing modern microcontroller WiFi solutions, even in the Internet age, requires a great deal of searching.  So to provide a list of popular microcontroller WiFi transceivers, I compiled the data in the table below.

    Product Info:          Link                  Link                 Link                 Link               Link                Link

Note 1: Also comes in Arduino Shield size with SD card slot for $39.95
Note 2: Adafruit and Sparkfun sell tested units with AT Firmware for $6.95.  eBay prices and quality vary.
Note 3: Adafruit sells tested units with AT Firmware for $6.95.  eBay prices and quality vary.
Note 4: Currents are probably somewhat higher than stock ESP-12 due to onboard LED and regulator.  

The data should be taken as  informative, not authoritative.  I may have not gotten the data 100% correct or comparing some information may not be a one-to-one comparison.  The cost information is in United States dollars - prices in other countries are comparable but may vary.

If there is data that appears incorrect, please leave a comment on the blog and I will see about correcting things.

Why these devices?

I tried to choose the most commonly used WIFi devices today.  There are several smaller manufacturers with WiFi boards and there are devices like the NodeMCU DevKit that implements an ESP-12 board with similar features to the Adafruit Huzzah ESP8266.  Sparkfun also sells a CC3000 board similar to the Adafruit Huzzah CC3000.  So the table does not list all available boards but does have a number of the more popular / different boards.  There are also some WiFi radios in Xbee form factors (one is in the picture, upper right) but use of the Xbee socket has waned in the last two years.

My thoughts

Like many experimenters, I have some criteria and  requirements for specific projects.
  • Price is always a factor, from hobbyists on a budget to groups manufacturing large product quantities.  There are generally three tiers of pricing.  Older modules cost above $70 US.  The CC3000 brought reliable communications down to half that, at about $35.  Then the new ESP8266 based devices have shattered the price points at $10 or less.
  • Software is one of my factors (and I'm sorry it isn't in the table). The WiFi Shield is a benchmark for many developers for a standard.  I rate Adafruit's CC3000 comparable on use, better on examples - Adafruit's tutorials on device use are very good (I'm biased having written for them some).  The ESP8266 information was pretty poor in the beginning but the number of people experimenting with these modules has generated a great increase in information.  So I rate ESP8266 as still a bit "wild west" but getting better.
  • Usability is a factor for specific projects.  Arduino shield form factors are easier for beginners but typically use more power, are larger, and are convenient only for those boards that have shield sockets.  Smaller boards are much easier to put into finished projects and novel uses such as wearable electronics.  This is a factor for each individual to judge.
  • Power must be considered for battery-operated projects.  Arduino shields do not lend themselves to low power.  The CC3000 has very good power management with one Adafruit tutorial providing excellent information.  Use of ESP8266 in low power modes is possible but standard examples are elusive.
Other criteria you might have are: manufacturability (putting chips into custom solutions), features (does the solution have what I need), etc.

Product lines are continually evolving.  Espressif has two new chips on their website which may lead to more hobby solutions and other companies may be working on new designs.


WiFi radios are very useful as many different types of devices, from cell phones to tablets, laptops to desktops, can communicate with these boards.  But most WiFi radio signals do not travel great distances.  They are also not very tolerant to data loss.  Other radio frequency solutions may be better for different applications.  But for ubiquity (finding these everywhere), WiFi is hard to beat.  That and they "speak" the language of the Internet (TCP and UDP), so a project could communicate (via a gateway device) with devices anywhere around the planet.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

ESP8266 Basics and Direction

The ESP8266 has become the price/performance darling of the Maker community.  What is not to like: small size, connectivity, powerful microcontroller.
ESP8266 Modules - the ESP-01 on the left, the ESP-12 module on the right

Well, there are frustrations.  Wiring the modules is not so easy, as pinouts are not breadboard friendly.  The microcontroller is new and not well documented in English, with some information proprietary, yes not Open Source (but processors generally are not fully open).

So what is driving the interest: size and cost.  The ESP-01 module is 14.54 mm x 24.9 mm(about an inch by a bit over half an inch - tiny compared to modules that proceeded it (which did not include a microcontroller).  And the cost of the ESP-01?  $6.95 from Adafruit (flashed with a reliable firmware and tested) down to $2.88 or so on eBay from China.  Compare to a $25 Arduino Uno and a $35 CC3000 wifi module.  A tenth the cost or less and perhaps a tenth the size.

The basic ESP-01 version has limited input/output pins.  Other models,up to the ESP-13 have additional pins of the microcontroller available.  A list of various versions is at

So if you see the connections on the modules above, The ESP-01 has two rows of 4 pins, making it hard to breadboard.  The ESP-12 module has metric pin spacing which does not connect to 0.1 inch breadboard spacing.  What to do?  Various people have various solutions.  On the ESP-12, companies have mounted them to larger 0.1" boards.  From plain carriers on eBay to Adafruit's new Huzzah board.


The following data are based on a 3.3V power supply, ambient temperature 25C and use the internal regulator measured. Data is from
802.11b, CCK 1Mbps, POUT=+19.5dBm215mA
802.11b, CCK 11Mbps, POUT=+18.5dBm197mA
802.11g, OFDM 54Mbps, POUT=+16dBm145mA
802.11n, MCS7, POUT =+14dBm135mA
802.11b, packet size of 1024 bytes, -80dBm60mA
802.11b, packet size of 1024 bytes, -70dBm60mA
802.11b, packet size of 1024 bytes, -65dBm62mA
Deep sleep10mA
Saving mode DTIM 11.2mA
Saving mode DTIM 30.86mA
The units should never be powered off more than 3.3 volts DC.  Using a voltage other than 3.3 volts, you will need to use a power regulator.  Looking at the power requirements above, a 250 ma regulator like the L4931-3.3 is pushing the limit.  If you are breadboarding, most people appear to be using the LD1117.3.3 800 ma linear regulator which gives plenty of current without requiring a heat sink on the regulator.  It is best to use a 10 microfarad capacitor on the input and especially the output to keep the output smooth.  If you are breadboarding only, there are breadboard power supplies that make it easier to generate 3.3 or 5 volts when you want it.


There are currently two general variations on firmware.  The first implements an "AT" command set to instruct the module how to connect via wifi.  A second firmware has been developed by NodeMCU implementing the Lua scripting language.  There are some other firmware images including one implementing the MQTT protocol.

User Software

Some smart folks have added the Espressif code compiler to the Arduino IDE.  This allows for the average person to write code that runs on the ESP8266 board itself (no Arduino or other controller required).  This makes it exciting that in a one inch size board, you have a complete Internet of Things node.

Where to go from here

While Lua allows for web apps with a small amount of code, I believe there is a great deal one can do to interface hardware with the ESP modules and compile code directly.  As a person who has done Arduino code for 2+ years (and a C die hard), that's where I'll be looking to provide projects.

For my first published project, See an ESP-01 connected to a temperature and humidity sensor, available via any web browser - at

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Arduino Packaging

Adafruit made an interesting suggestion regarding the Arduino vs. Arduino lawsuit. Adafruit noticed that the packaging for the Arduino Uno and Leonardo includes a pamphlet that states:

Manufactured under license
from Arduino by

Smart Projects is the former name of Arduino Srl. Arduino Srl is claiming to be the trademark holder and has forked the Arduino IDE.

If Arduino Srl feels they own the trademark, why would they include this statement in their packaging?

Here are my package inserts from retail Arduino packages over the past couple years.  They all have the license text.

Unlike Sparkfun who decided to walk a line between the companies, I believe the - the original founders - as holding the Arduino ecosphere rights (it was their creative work from which the project was born).